The Wood Bull Guides

Part VI: Practice and Procedure (s.31 to 44)

Click here to expand all subsections below or click on the individual subsection to expand/collapse the details for that subsection

  • 31(1) DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDINGS

    31(1) The Tribunal shall dispose of proceedings before it in accordance with any practices and procedures that are required under,

    (a) this Act or a regulation made under this Act;

    (b) the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, unless that Act conflicts with this Act, a regulation made under this Act or the Tribunal’s rules; or

    (c) any other general or special Act.

  • 31(2) TRIBUNAL’S PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

    31(2) The Tribunal shall, in respect of each proceeding before it, adopt any practices and procedures provided for in its rules or that are otherwise available to the Tribunal that in its opinion offer the best opportunity for a fair, just and expeditious resolution of the merits of the proceedings.

    Related Sections

    Section 32 provides that the Tribunal may make rules governing its practices and procedures.

  • 31(3) STATUTORY POWERS PROCEDURE ACT

    31(3) Despite section 32 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, this Act, regulations made under this Act and the Tribunal’s rules prevail over the provisions of that Act with which they conflict.

    Related Statutes

    Section 32 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act provides as follows:

    Conflict

    Unless it is expressly provided in any other Act that its provisions and regulations, rules or by-laws made under it apply despite anything in this Act, the provisions of this Act prevail over the provisions of such other Act and over regulations, rules or by-laws made under such other Act which conflict therewith.

    Wood Bull Commentary

    The LPAT Act, regulations made under the LPAT Act, and the Tribunal's Rules of Practice and Procedure prevail, in the event of a conflict, over any provision(s) in the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

  • 32(1) RULES

    32(1) The Tribunal may make rules governing its practices and procedures.

  • 32(2) GENERAL OR PARTICULAR

    32(2) The rules may be of general or particular application.

  • 32(3) OTHER RULES

    32(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the rules may,

    (a) provide for and require the use of hearings or of practices and procedures that are alternatives to traditional adjudicative or adversarial procedures;

    (a.1) provide for specified circumstances in which participation in mediation or other dispute resolution processes by parties to a proceeding is mandatory;

    (b) provide for and require notice to be provided in a particular manner;

    (c) authorize the Tribunal to hold hearings or other proceedings in writing or by any electronic or automated means;

    (d) authorize the Tribunal to combine two or more proceedings or any part of them, or hear two or more proceedings at the same time;

    (e) authorize the Tribunal to appoint a person from among a class of parties to a proceeding to represent the class where, in the opinion of the Tribunal, the parties have a common interest; and

    (f) provide for when and how the Tribunal may hear from a person other than a party.

  • 32(4) LEGISLATION ACT, 2006

    32(4)  Part III (Regulations) of the Legislation Act, 2006 does not apply to the rules.

  • 32(5) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULES

    32(5) Unless the Tribunal’s failure to comply with the rules or its exercise of discretion under the rules in a particular manner caused a substantial wrong that affected the final disposition of a matter, neither the failure nor the exercise of discretion is a ground for setting aside a decision of the Tribunal on an application for judicial review or an appeal.

  • 33(1) POWER TO REQUIRE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

    33(1) The Tribunal may direct the parties to a proceeding before it to participate in a case management conference prior to a hearing, for the following purposes:

    1. To identify additional parties to the proceeding.

    2. To identify, define or narrow the issues raised by the proceeding.

    3. To identify facts or evidence that may be agreed upon by the parties.

    4. To provide directions for disclosure of information.

    5. To discuss opportunities for resolving one or more issues in the proceeding, including the possible use of mediation or other dispute resolution processes.

    6. To establish dates by which any steps in the proceeding are to be taken or begun.

    7. To determine the length, schedule and location of a hearing, if any.

    8. To determine the order of presentation of submissions.

    9. To deal with any other matter that may assist in the fair, just and expeditious resolution of the issues. 

    CaseLaw

    Corbett v Arnprior (Town), LPAT (14 November 2018) provides an example of a case management conference (CMC) decision and order, including the Tribunal's decision to add the applicant [of the appealed zoning by-law amendment] as a party and an order requiring the applicant to file a summary in a format similar to a responding case synopsis provided for in the Tribunal's Rule 26.16.  

    On the issue of whether a non-appellant applicant [for a land use change] may be granted party status prior to a CMC in an appeal under s.38(1) of LPATA, Owens v. Waterloo (Region)LPAT (14 December 2018) provides the following conclusion:

    LPATA clearly requires the Tribunal, in such appeals, to determine requests for party status from among the written submissions submitted prior to a CMC and to identify additional parties at the CMC. While the Tribunal may have jurisdiction to grant party status for the purpose of bringing preliminary motions, this is not the most just, expeditious, or cost-effective way to proceed. There is an expectation in both the legislation and Tribunal’s Rules that all such matters will be addressed at a CMC, when the Tribunal has the benefit of a complete record and has had the opportunity to determine all of the parties to an appeal.

  • 33(1.1) POWER TO REQUIRE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

    33(1.1) The Tribunal may direct the parties to a proceeding before it to participate in mediation or another dispute resolution process for the purpose of resolving one or more issues in the proceeding, regardless of whether or not a case management conference has been held.

  • 33(2) POWER TO EXAMINE

    33(2) At any stage of a proceeding, the Tribunal may,

    (a) examine a party to the proceeding;

    (a.1) examine a witness in the proceeding;

    (b) examine a person who makes a written submission to the Tribunal with respect to the proceeding under section 33.2;

    (c) require a party to the proceeding or a person who makes a written submission to the Tribunal with respect to the proceeding under section 33.2 to produce evidence for examination by the Tribunal;

    (d) require a party to the proceeding to produce a witness for examination by the Tribunal.

  • 33(2.1) POWERS TO LIMIT WITNESS EXAMINATION, CROSS-EXAMINATION

    33(2.1) The Tribunal may limit any examination or cross-examination of a witness,

    (a) if the Tribunal is satisfied that all matter relevant to the issues in the proceeding have been fully or fairly disclosed; or

    (b) in any other circumstances the Tribunal considers fair and appropriate.

  • 33(3) POWER TO MAKE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDERS

    33(3) The Tribunal may order that any document filed in a proceeding before it be treated as confidential and not be disclosed to the public, where the Tribunal is of the opinion that,

    (a) matters involving public security may be disclosed; or

    (b) the document contains information regarding intimate financial or personal matters or other matters that are of such a nature that the public interest or the interest of a person served by avoiding disclosure outweighs the desirability of adhering to the principle that documents filed in a proceeding be available to the public.

  • 33(4) POWER TO FIX COSTS

    33(4)  The Tribunal may fix the costs of and incidental to any proceeding in accordance with the rules and regulations made under this Act.

  • 33.1(1) MANDATORY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IN PLANNING ACT APPEALS

    33.1(1) The Tribunal shall direct the parties to an appeal under subsection 17(24), (36) or (40), 22(7), 34(11) or (19) or 51(34) of the Planning Act to participate in a case management conference prior to the hearing of the appeal, for the purposes set out under subsection 33(1) of this Act.

  • 33.1(2) SAME

    33.1(2) A case management conference required under subsection (1) shall include discussion of opportunities for resolving one or more issues in the appeal, including the possible use of mediation or other dispute resolution processes.

  • 33.1(3) EXCEPTION

    33.1(3) A case management conference need not be held if the parties to the appeal have entered into a settlement respecting all of the issues raised by the proceeding, despite any direction given under subsection (1).

  • 33.2 NON-PARTIES, WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ONLY

    33.2 Unless any general or special Act specifies otherwise, a person who is not a party to a proceeding before the Tribunal may make submissions to the Tribunal with respect to the proceeding in writing only.

  • 34 DECISIONS OF TRIBUNAL TO BE FINAL

    34. Except as provided for in sections 35 and 37, a decision or order of the Tribunal is final and binding.

  • 35 REVIEW OF TRIBUNAL DECISION

    35. The Tribunal may review, rescind or vary any decision or order made by it in accordance with the rules.

Table of Contents

 

Note: Material on the Wood Bull website is intended as general information and commentary.  Please consult the e-Laws website for the legislation.  In order to make these Wood Bull Guides useful resources, we welcome any comments and suggestions.  

65 Queen St. West Suite 1400, Toronto, ON M5H 2M5
Wood Bull LLP Logo
Law Firm Marketing | Cubicle Fugitive